I never really understood why feminism has not coincided I mean completely, with ecology. Admittedly, I was not alive in the 70s (or barely) but the fact is that today, women are left environmentalists (D. Voynet, C. Dufflot) and feminists have never anything green (Dati kind): double result disorder. What torture to see the sweet C. Dufflot try to battle politics! She will lose her beautiful long hair. There is that Brigitte Bardot who escapes these contradictions: the femininity was ingenuous, and his sense of nature is not incidental. It is no coincidence that she never believed in feminism.
Ecology was the instrument of feminism hello but he did not before! How not to bring women of nature? Indissolubly linked to desire and the pain of creation, the cyclical rhythm universal voltage, in itself, the menstrual cycle, women are quite willing, if she does not lose too northerly to understand , respect nature, feel the permanence in the life cycle (the anti-Dati). Feminism is absolutely anti-woman because he wants to forget femininity and turn women into men (same job, same ideas, role Sexual interchangeably), and should reject it!
Frankly, it just has to see the face of Anne Lauvergeon, Laurence Parisot, Margaret Thatcher or Edith Cresson to understand what happens, feminism. Exhausted by a doubling of work life and home life (she preserve all), masculinized by exercise an important function, as men obsessed with success, excess, constantly spied on its results which are external, the woman feminist ugly and withers quickly. How is beautiful, a contrast Brigitte Lahaie (I like Bridget) who managed to escape the porn industry to waste his time wisely in the microwave! Segolene Royal who failed in 2007, it has also retained a certain freshness. But it will perhaps not sufficiently understood the lesson ...
The man who failed in all his undertakings, the woman tries to compete in turn, thinking suddenly higher. When she has failed everywhere, too, everything will be fine.
0 comments:
Post a Comment